Perpetual (Perps) vs Spot Trading in Crypto Explained

Perpetual (Perps) vs Spot Trading in Crypto Explained

Summary: Spot trading involves directly buying crypto for immediate ownership, with clear pricing and lower risks. Perpetual futures (perps), however, let traders speculate using leverage without owning the underlying asset, adding complexity and risks through funding rates and liquidations.

While spot trading is simpler and more regulated, perp markets attract greater trading activity due to leverage and flexibility, accounting for around $21 trillion in quarterly volume (over four times the size of spot markets).

Perps vs Spot Trading in Crypto Overview

Spot and perpetual futures (perps) are the two dominant trading formats in crypto, both widely used across centralized exchanges. While they often share similar interfaces and tools, they operate on different financial models, with clear distinctions in ownership, leverage, and trade structure.

Spot trading refers to the direct purchase or sale of a cryptocurrency, where the asset is exchanged at the market price and delivered instantly to the trader’s wallet (on the CEX). It’s a straightforward model with minimal complexity, relying on actual asset transfer and no margin or contract mechanics.

Perp trading involves synthetic contracts that track the price of an asset without transferring ownership. These contracts never expire and are typically traded with leverage, using the same interface layout as spot but with additional features like margin settings, liquidation levels, and funding rate indicators.

According to TokenInsight’s Q1 2025 report, total spot trading volume across the top 10 exchanges fell to $4.6 trillion, down 13.2% from the previous quarter. In contrast, derivatives markets, recorded $21 trillion in trading volume, an 8.7% drop, highlighting the continued dominance of leveraged products.

Spot vs Perps (Derivate) Volume Share in Q1, 2025

Pricing Mechanisms in Perps vs Spot Trading

Spot and perpetual futures markets often show similar prices for the same asset, but they’re calculated differently behind the scenes. Understanding how each pricing model works is key to recognizing the forces that move crypto markets.

Comparison of Price Drivers in Spot vs Perpetual Markets

Spot Price Determination

Spot prices reflect the current market value of a cryptocurrency based on direct buying and selling activity.

Key factors influencing spot price:

  • Order book depth: The price is determined by the highest price a buyer is bidding and the lowest price a seller is asking, with the midpoint often used as a live reference for market value.
  • Trade execution: The last trade price constantly updates based on executed orders, meaning even a single large market order can shift the displayed spot price.
  • Exchange liquidity: On highly liquid exchanges like Binance or Coinbase, the large number of orders leads to tighter spreads and more stable prices.
  • Cross-exchange arbitrage: If BTC is trading at $90,000 on one CEX and $90,200 on another, arbitrage traders will buy low and sell high, quickly closing the gap and syncing spot prices across markets.
Binance Spot Trading

Perpetual Futures Pricing (Index)

Perp contracts track the price of an underlying asset using a calculated index rather than direct market trades, with the most popular crypto perpetual exchanges icluding Binance, Bybit, and OKX.

Key factors influencing perp pricing:

  • Index aggregation: The reference price is pulled from several major spot exchanges to create a single index, reducing the impact of manipulation on any one platform.
  • Funding rate balance: If the perp trades above the index, long traders pay shorts a fee, encouraging new shorts and pushing the price back toward the index.
  • Supply-demand shifts: If too many traders go long on a perp, the price may rise above the index until funding or liquidations bring it back in line.
  • Leverage influence: In high-volatility moments, leveraged positions can be rapidly liquidated, causing price swings that wouldn’t occur in spot markets where trades are fully collateralized.
  • Liquidity concentration zones: Perp prices often move toward areas with dense liquidity or stop clusters, which can be visualized using tools like a Bitcoin liquidity heatmap.
Bybit Perpetual Futures

Perps vs Spot Trading Fees

Trading fees are one of the most overlooked but critical parts of strategy, especially in crypto where frequent orders or high leverage can quickly eat into gains. Spot and perpetual markets charge fees differently; not just in how much, but in how often and why those fees are applied.

Fee Schedule on Binance, Bybit, OKX

Spot Trading Fees

In spot trading, fees are simple and apply only when a trade is executed. Here’s how it typically works:

  • Maker vs taker fees: Most exchanges like Binance, OKX, and Coinbase Pro charge around 0.10% for taker orders and slightly less for maker orders that add liquidity.
  • Volume-based reductions: Fee tiers adjust based on 30-day trading volume; for instance, trading over $1 million on Kraken might drop fees to 0.04% or lower.
  • Token-based discounts: Exchanges often give lower fees if you pay with their native token (BNB on Binance, KCS on KuCoin, or GT on Gate.io), reducing costs by up to 25%.
  • No recurring charges: Once a spot trade is completed, there are no further costs: no interest, no funding, and no position-related fees.

Perpetual Fees

Perp trading adds a second layer of cost through ongoing position-related charges. Here's what traders need to account for:

  • Trade execution costs: Maker and taker fees for perps are usually around 0.02% and 0.06% respectively on exchanges like Bybit, Bitget, and OKX.
  • Funding rate mechanism: To prevent perp prices from drifting away from spot, funding payments are exchanged between long and short traders every 8 hours based on open interest imbalance.
  • Funding rate example: If BTC perps are trading above spot and the funding rate is +0.01%, long traders will pay short traders $10 for every $100,000 held per cycle.
  • Extra margin costs: Perp trading also requires maintaining margin and carries the risk of liquidation, which can add hidden costs through fees or forced position closures.

Leverage Use in Perps vs Spot Trading

Spot trading is mostly non-leveraged, but some exchanges offer margin trading as a way to apply limited leverage. For example Kraken allow users to borrow funds to trade with 2x to 5x leverage in spot markets, though positions are still tied to actual asset ownership and require repayment of borrowed capital with interest.

Perpetual contracts are built specifically for leveraged trading, with some platforms offering up to 500x leverage (for MEXC) on pairs like BTC/USDT. On Bybit or Bitget, traders can open a $100,000 position with just $1,000 of margin, but they must maintain minimum collateral or risk liquidation if the market moves against them.

MEXC 500x Leverage

Perpetual Futures vs Spot Trading Regulations

Spot trading is generally more widely regulated and accessible, as it involves the direct exchange of assets without leverage. Most global exchanges (like Coinbase in the U.S. or Bitstamp in the EU) offer spot trading under licenses from local financial regulators, such as the SEC, FINRA, or ESMA.

Crypto perpetual futures, on the other hand, are more tightly restricted due to their leveraged nature and risk exposure. In the United States, platforms like Binance and Bybit are not permitted to offer perps to retail users, while CME offers regulated crypto futures products for institutional clients.

Other regions have also introduced stricter oversight on derivatives. For example, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has banned retail trading of crypto derivatives entirely, while in Singapore, regulated exchanges must register under the Payment Services Act before offering any leveraged products.

Risks in Perpetual Futures vs Spot Trading

Both spot and perpetual futures trading carry risk, but the type and severity of those risks differ based on how each market works. While spot trading risks are tied to asset volatility and ownership, perps introduce additional layers through leverage and liquidation mechanics.

Spot Trading Risks

Spot trading may seem simple, but traders still face multiple types of risk across platforms and assets:

  • Price volatility: Coins like BTC and ETH can drop 10-20% in a single day, and smaller altcoins can lose 90% of their value overnight (like Mantra's OM token) in reaction to market sentiment or news.
  • Insolvency risk: Without verifiable proof of reserves, centralized exchanges can mismanage or misuse customer funds, as seen in the collapse of FTX, leaving holders exposed despite holding no leverage.
  • Custodial risk: Leaving funds on an exchange, even a major one like Binance or Kraken, exposes traders to potential hacks, freezes, or withdrawal suspensions during peak volatility.
  • Project-specific failures: Tokens tied to flawed protocols, like Terra (LUNA), have collapsed entirely, wiping out holders despite no leverage being used.
  • Regulatory uncertainty: Spot traders may suddenly lose access to assets or platforms if a government bans certain tokens or revokes exchange licenses, as seen in the EU crackdown on some stablecoins.
Proof of Reserves and Risks of Spot Crypto Exchanges

Perpetual Futures Risks

Perp trading adds layers of risk that can magnify losses quickly, especially for leveraged positions held in volatile conditions:

  • Liquidation risk: A 1-2% move against a 50x leveraged position can result in instant liquidation, causing the trader to lose their entire margin with no chance to exit manually.
  • Funding rate pressure: In trending markets, holding a long or short position for multiple funding intervals can rack up large costs. For example, $60/day on a $100,000 long if the funding rate is 0.025%.
  • Price divergence: Perp contracts can trade above or below spot during heavy market imbalance, leading to poor entries and exits even if your market thesis is right.
  • Forced liquidations and system risk: If volatility spikes and many traders are liquidated at once, it can overwhelm the exchange’s risk engine, as seen during crashes on BitMEX or Bybit in 2020-2021.
Crypto Liquidations Risk in Perpetual Exchanges

Perps vs Spot Trading in Decentralized Markets

Decentralized trading continues to gain ground in both spot and derivatives markets, driven by improvements in liquidity infrastructure and order execution.

The share of DEX spot volume relative to centralized exchanges has risen to over 15% as of April 2025, while decentralized perpetuals are starting to claim meaningful volume and market share.

Decentralized Exchanges Are Grabbing Market Share From CEXs

Decentralized Spot Trading

Spot trading on DEXs operates through automated market makers or liquidity routing protocols, offering direct asset swaps without intermediaries. On Ethereum, Uniswap remains a primary source of on-chain liquidity, especially for long-tail assets and stablecoin pairs.

On Solana, Jupiter handles over $4 billion in weekly trading volume by aggregating order flow across venues like Raydium, Lifinity, and Orca. Its smart routing system allows for efficient price execution with minimal slippage, which has made it the default backend for many wallets and aggregators.

Raydium plays a central role in this stack, acting as a liquidity provider for routed trades with active market-making strategies. While its TVL has fluctuated, its role as a backbone for AMM-based trading remains steady due to consistent Solana-native usage and token pair depth.

Raydium Solana Decentralized Spot Exchange

Decentralized Perpetuals

Perpetual futures in DeFi use either AMM or order book infrastructure, with growing differentiation between capital efficiency and speed of execution. Hyperliquid has emerged as the highest-volume decentralized perp exchange, reporting over $31 billion in weekly volume and around $6.1 billion in daily activity as of late April 2025.

Unlike AMM perps, Hyperliquid uses an off-chain matching engine combined with on-chain custody. This design supports low-latency execution while maintaining user control over funds. It does not rely on liquidity pools, so there is no TVL metric, and liquidity is entirely derived from active trading positions.

This contrasts with earlier perp DEX models like dYdX or GMX, which use liquidity pools and oracle-based pricing. These designs introduce potential for price impact during volatility, slower trade resolution, and less precise order execution compared to order book systems.

Hyperliquid Decentralized Perpetual Exchange

Final Thoughts

Long-term investors typically favor spot markets, where they can take direct ownership of assets and avoid the risks tied to leverage or liquidations. Perpetuals are more often used by active traders looking to hedge, amplify exposure, or take short-term directional bets without moving spot holdings.

Choosing between them comes down to your time horizon, risk tolerance, and whether you're positioning for conviction or reacting to momentum.

Frequently asked questions

What are the pros and cons of using leverage in crypto compared to traditional markets?

How do funding rates actually work in crypto perps, and can they be traded directly?

How does slippage differ between spot and perpetual trades, especially during volatility?

How do liquidation mechanics work in perps versus spot margin positions?

Are there tax implications that differ between spot and perp trading?

Written by 

Antony Bianco

Head of Research

Antony Bianco, co-founder of Datawallet, is a DeFi expert and active member of the Ethereum community who assist in zero-knowledge proof research for layer 2's. With a Master’s in Computer Science, he has made significant contributions to the crypto ecosystem, working with various DAOs on-chain.